Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) vs. Fundamental Rights: A Detailed Comparison

Spread the love

Introduction

The Indian Constitution establishes a framework for governance by incorporating Fundamental Rights (FRs) and Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs). While Fundamental Rights (Part III, Articles 12-35) guarantee individual liberties, DPSPs (Part IV, Articles 36-51) provide guidelines for the government to create a welfare state.

Though distinct, both aim to ensure justice, equality, and socio-economic development. Over the years, the judiciary has played a crucial role in balancing Fundamental Rights and DPSPs, ensuring both function harmoniously.

This article explores their similarities, differences, judicial interpretations, and impact on governance.

What are Fundamental Rights?

Fundamental Rights (FRs) are constitutional guarantees provided to individuals, ensuring freedom, equality, and protection against state actions. These rights are justiciable, meaning citizens can approach courts to enforce them.

Key Features of Fundamental Rights

Guaranteed by the Constitution (Part III, Articles 12-35).
Justiciable (can be enforced through courts).
Provides civil, political, and personal liberties.
Restricts arbitrary state actions.
Available to individuals and, in some cases, groups or communities.

Types of Fundamental Rights

Right to Equality (Articles 14-18) – Ensures equal treatment and abolishes discrimination.
Right to Freedom (Articles 19-22) – Guarantees freedom of speech, assembly, movement, profession, and protection from arbitrary detention.
Right Against Exploitation (Articles 23-24) – Prohibits human trafficking, forced labor, and child labor.
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28) – Ensures religious freedom and separation of religion from the state.
Cultural and Educational Rights (Articles 29-30) – Protects minority communities’ cultural and educational institutions.
Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32) – Allows citizens to approach the Supreme Court for rights enforcement.

What are Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP)?

DPSPs are guidelines that direct the government to frame policies aimed at socio-economic justice. Unlike Fundamental Rights, DPSPs are not legally enforceable but serve as an obligation on the state.

Key Features of DPSPs

Guidelines for policy-making (Part IV, Articles 36-51).
Not justiciable (cannot be enforced by courts).
Promote social, economic, and political justice.
Provide a roadmap for governance and welfare.

Types of DPSPs

Socialistic Principles – Articles 38-43 (ensure social welfare, fair distribution of wealth, labor welfare, equal pay, etc.).
Gandhian Principles – Articles 40-48 (promote self-governance, rural development, prohibition of alcohol, animal protection, etc.).
Liberal-Intellectual Principles – Articles 44-51 (promote a uniform civil code, international peace, environmental protection, etc.).

Similarities Between Fundamental Rights and DPSPs

Though FRs and DPSPs serve different purposes, they share common goals:

Derived from the Constitution – Both are constitutional provisions ensuring justice, equality, and governance.
Aim for Social Welfare – Both contribute to India’s progress and citizen well-being.
Complement Each Other – Many DPSPs support the realization of Fundamental Rights.
Interpreted Together – Courts have used DPSPs to expand the scope of FRs (e.g., Right to Education).
Inspired by International Principles – Both incorporate values from global human rights charters.

Differences Between Fundamental Rights and DPSPs

Feature	Fundamental Rights (FRs)	Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs)
Nature	Justiciable (can be enforced by courts).	Non-justiciable (courts cannot enforce them directly).
Objective	Protects individual liberties.	Guides the government for socio-economic justice.
Enforcement	Enforceable through courts.	Not enforceable by courts but binding in spirit.
Scope	Provides civil and political rights.	Provides socio-economic and governance guidelines.
Government Obligation	Negative obligation (restricts state actions).	Positive obligation (directs state policies).
Supremacy	Initially given higher priority over DPSPs.	Subordinate to FRs, but later interpretations balanced both.

Judicial Interpretation: Balancing FRs and DPSPs

1. Champakam Dorairajan Case (1951)

The Supreme Court ruled that Fundamental Rights are superior to DPSPs.
Led to the First Amendment (1951), empowering the government to enact reservation policies (DPSP, Article 46).

2. Keshavananda Bharati Case (1973)

Introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine, ensuring DPSPs cannot override FRs.
Stressed harmonization between FRs and DPSPs.

3. Minerva Mills Case (1980)

Declared Fundamental Rights and DPSPs as equally important.
Ensured balance between individual rights and state welfare.

4. Unnikrishnan Case (1993) – Right to Education

Held that education (DPSP, Article 45) is part of the Right to Life (FR, Article 21).
Led to Article 21A, making education a Fundamental Right.

5. Olga Tellis Case (1985) – Right to Livelihood

Ruled that Right to Livelihood is an essential part of Right to Life (Article 21).
Strengthened DPSPs related to labor and housing.

Impact of DPSPs on Law Making

1. Education Laws

Right to Education Act (2009) – Based on Article 45 (DPSP), converted into Article 21A (FR).

2. Environmental Protection

Environment Protection Act (1986) – Inspired by Article 48A (DPSP), ensuring sustainable development.

3. Economic & Labor Welfare

Equal Remuneration Act (1976) – Enforces equal pay for equal work (Article 39(d)).
Minimum Wages Act (1948) – Supports labor welfare (Article 43).

4. Social Justice & Reservation

Mandal Commission (OBC Reservation, 1992) – Implemented Article 46 (upliftment of weaker sections).

5. Uniform Civil Code (UCC)

Debated under Article 44 (DPSP) – Aims to unify personal laws across religions.

Conclusion

While Fundamental Rights and DPSPs differ in nature and enforceability, both serve India’s democratic and social welfare goals. Over the years, courts have emphasized their harmonization, ensuring that DPSPs support and strengthen Fundamental Rights.

As India progresses, DPSPs continue to shape legislations and policies, proving that though not enforceable, they are essential for governance and national development.