Directive Principles of State Policy in India: Challenges and Their Role in Governance

Spread the love

Introduction

The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs) form an essential part of the Indian Constitution, guiding the state in governance and policymaking to establish a just, equitable, and welfare-oriented society. Enshrined in Part IV (Articles 36-51) of the Constitution, DPSPs reflect the vision of the framers to promote social and economic justice. Inspired by the Irish Constitution and influenced by the ideals of Mahatma Gandhi, these principles aim to create a welfare state.

However, DPSPs are non-justiciable, meaning they are not enforceable by courts. While they act as a guiding force for governance, their implementation faces numerous challenges due to financial constraints, political unwillingness, and conflicts with Fundamental Rights (Part III of the Constitution). Despite these obstacles, DPSPs and Fundamental Rights complement each other in ensuring social, economic, and political justice.

This essay examines the challenges in implementing DPSPs, their role in shaping Indian policies, and their relationship with Fundamental Rights.

Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs): An Overview

The DPSPs are classified into three broad categories:

Social and Economic Justice (Articles 38-39, 41-43, 46, 47)
- Promote equal pay for equal work.
- Protect women, children, and weaker sections.
- Ensure living wages and humane conditions for workers.
- Provide education and public health.
Gandhian Principles (Articles 40, 43, 46, 47, 48)
- Promote cottage industries and cooperative societies.
- Establish Gram Panchayats for local self-governance.
- Prohibit the consumption of intoxicating substances.
Liberal-Intellectual and International Principles (Articles 44, 48, 48A, 49-51)
- Promote a Uniform Civil Code (UCC).
- Protect environment and wildlife.
- Maintain separation of judiciary from the executive.
- Foster international peace and cooperation.

These principles serve as a moral obligation for the state to work toward a welfare-based society.

Challenges in Implementing DPSPs

1. Non-Justiciability and Lack of Legal Enforcement

One of the major challenges in implementing DPSPs is that they are not legally enforceable. Unlike Fundamental Rights, which can be claimed in court, DPSPs remain aspirational goals dependent on government willingness and policy priorities.

For example, the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) under Article 44 has not been implemented due to social, religious, and political resistance, despite several judicial pronouncements advocating it.

2. Financial and Economic Constraints

Many DPSPs, such as free and compulsory education (Article 45), public health provisions (Article 47), and livelihood guarantees (Article 39A), require significant financial resources. Developing countries like India often struggle with budget limitations, preventing full implementation of these welfare measures.

For instance, although the Right to Education Act (2009) was enacted to implement Article 45, its execution has been hindered by insufficient infrastructure and teacher shortages.

3. Political Will and Policy Priorities

Successive governments have prioritized different DPSPs based on political motives. For example:

Labour welfare (Article 43) has seen progress through schemes like MGNREGA (2005).
Prohibition of alcohol (Article 47) has been inconsistently applied across states, with many rolling back policies due to revenue loss.

Similarly, the implementation of Article 48A (Environmental Protection) is often neglected in favor of industrial growth.

4. Conflicts with Fundamental Rights

At times, DPSPs conflict with Fundamental Rights, leading to judicial interventions. Some instances include:

Land Reforms and Property Rights:
- In Champakam Dorairajan v. State of Madras (1951), the Supreme Court ruled that Fundamental Rights prevail over DPSPs in case of conflict.
- The Right to Property (Article 31) was abolished by the 44th Amendment (1978) to facilitate land reforms.
Reservation in Education and Employment:
- Affirmative action under Article 46 (upliftment of weaker sections) has led to debates about merit vs. social justice.
- The Mandal Commission (1990) report sparked protests over OBC reservations.

5. Lack of Public Awareness and Bureaucratic Resistance

Many welfare provisions under DPSPs remain underutilized due to lack of awareness among citizens. The Right to Information (RTI) Act (2005) has helped improve transparency, but bureaucratic resistance slows down implementation.

For example, Gram Panchayats (Article 40) were given constitutional status under the 73rd Amendment (1992), but rural governance remains weak due to political interference and lack of empowerment.

6. Globalization and Market-Oriented Reforms

Economic liberalization (1991) has shifted India’s policy focus from welfare to market-driven reforms. While industrial growth has boosted the economy, it has also led to income inequality, environmental degradation, and weakening of labor rights, contradicting the spirit of DPSPs.

For instance, large-scale privatization in healthcare contradicts Article 47, which aims to improve public health services.

DPSPs and Their Complementary Relationship with Fundamental Rights

Despite challenges, DPSPs and Fundamental Rights are not contradictory but complementary. They work together to ensure social justice, economic equality, and democratic governance.

1. Judicial Interpretation and Harmonization

The Supreme Court has played a crucial role in interpreting DPSPs in harmony with Fundamental Rights:

Golaknath Case (1967) – Initially ruled that Fundamental Rights cannot be amended to implement DPSPs.
Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973) – Established the Basic Structure Doctrine, allowing Parliament to amend the Constitution while maintaining its core principles.
Minerva Mills Case (1980) – Asserted that Fundamental Rights and DPSPs must be balanced, ensuring neither dominates the other.

2. Converting DPSPs into Fundamental Rights

Over time, several DPSPs have been incorporated into Fundamental Rights through constitutional amendments:

Right to Education (Article 21A, 86th Amendment, 2002) – Originally a DPSP, now a Fundamental Right.
Right to Livelihood (Expanded interpretation of Article 21) – Strengthened by judicial rulings.
Right to a Healthy Environment – Though a DPSP under Article 48A, the judiciary has recognized it as a Fundamental Right under Article 21.

3. Role of Welfare Schemes in Bridging the Gap

Governments have introduced various schemes to fulfill DPSPs while upholding Fundamental Rights:

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA, 2005) – Implements right to work (Article 41).
Food Security Act (2013) – Strengthens nutrition and livelihood (Article 47).
Mid-Day Meal Scheme – Supports Right to Education (Article 21A) and nutrition (Article 47).

Such policies help integrate DPSPs into governance, despite their non-justiciable nature.

Conclusion

While Directive Principles of State Policy are not legally enforceable, they provide a moral and constitutional foundation for governance in India. Their implementation faces challenges due to financial constraints, political priorities, and conflicts with Fundamental Rights. However, judicial interpretations and government policies have increasingly bridged the gap, ensuring that DPSPs influence lawmaking and social welfare programs.

To strengthen their implementation, India needs:

Stronger financial commitments to welfare schemes.
Greater public awareness of rights and government obligations.
Political willingness to prioritize long-term social justice over short-term gains.

Ultimately, DPSPs, along with Fundamental Rights, ensure that India progresses as a social, economic, and political democracy, upholding justice, equality, and human dignity.